<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parenting Coordination with High-Conflict Families</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticdiversions.com/index.php/parenting-coordination-with-high-conflict-families/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticdiversions.com/index.php/parenting-coordination-with-high-conflict-families/</link>
	<description>1.  Good counsel on matters of relationships, families and family law.  2.  The efforts of good people working together to advance the mind, arouse the heart, and amuse the spirit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: winema</title>
		<link>http://domesticdiversions.com/index.php/parenting-coordination-with-high-conflict-families/comment-page-1/#comment-13867</link>
		<dc:creator>winema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticdiversions.com/?p=609#comment-13867</guid>
		<description>Parenting coordinators (PC) are new SCAM schema on Americans!!! They will try to convince unaware parents to go to them for custody evaluation during the child custody dispute. They works in a gang with several corrupt lawyers who will try to concince you that it may be cheaper then go to court. To get your trust they will pretend to be fair and just in beginner, but one parties fall into his trap, they will suck thousand of dollars from both parties involved. At the end of custody evaluation PC will recommend you to go to Parental Coordinator to himself of to one of his friends. Then he will totally get control of both parents life, because PC are both judicial, executive, legislative and financialy motivated party in this case, i.e. they making the “rules”, decide if you follow them, panish parents by putting limitations on all aspects of parental time. Using you natural love to kids he will be controlling every step of your relationships with them and you personal life. PC will tell you where you can live, what friends you can have, he will control every word you can say, what candy your kids can eat, and many more – sky is the limit, because there is no law controling them, whatever they think in “child best interest” they can do. Also PC will charge both parties for every word of this precious &quot;recommendations&quot;. Eventually he will cost you both thousands more then just go to court. DO NOT FALL INTO HIS SCHEMA! If you did already, try to go to court and have a judge to remove PC from your case, but many times PCs are very resilient to removal. If file malpractice suite or complaint to psyhologyst board, PC probably drop, but you will be judged by the same PC like one you have, and PC ask court to assign a new PC they choose to your family. 

This several good links for parenting coordinator victims:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parenting_Coordinator
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/parenting-coordination/parenting-coordination.html
http://ncmbts.blogspot.com/2010/01/parenting-coordinator-concept-lack-of.html
http://www.barbrack.com/news/20-rules-of-engagement-for-parent-cooridnators.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parenting coordinators (PC) are new SCAM schema on Americans!!! They will try to convince unaware parents to go to them for custody evaluation during the child custody dispute. They works in a gang with several corrupt lawyers who will try to concince you that it may be cheaper then go to court. To get your trust they will pretend to be fair and just in beginner, but one parties fall into his trap, they will suck thousand of dollars from both parties involved. At the end of custody evaluation PC will recommend you to go to Parental Coordinator to himself of to one of his friends. Then he will totally get control of both parents life, because PC are both judicial, executive, legislative and financialy motivated party in this case, i.e. they making the “rules”, decide if you follow them, panish parents by putting limitations on all aspects of parental time. Using you natural love to kids he will be controlling every step of your relationships with them and you personal life. PC will tell you where you can live, what friends you can have, he will control every word you can say, what candy your kids can eat, and many more – sky is the limit, because there is no law controling them, whatever they think in “child best interest” they can do. Also PC will charge both parties for every word of this precious &#8220;recommendations&#8221;. Eventually he will cost you both thousands more then just go to court. DO NOT FALL INTO HIS SCHEMA! If you did already, try to go to court and have a judge to remove PC from your case, but many times PCs are very resilient to removal. If file malpractice suite or complaint to psyhologyst board, PC probably drop, but you will be judged by the same PC like one you have, and PC ask court to assign a new PC they choose to your family. </p>
<p>This several good links for parenting coordinator victims:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parenting_Coordinator" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parenting_Coordinator</a><br />
<a href="http://www.thelizlibrary.org/parenting-coordination/parenting-coordination.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelizlibrary.org/parenting-coordination/parenting-coordination.html</a><br />
<a href="http://ncmbts.blogspot.com/2010/01/parenting-coordinator-concept-lack-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://ncmbts.blogspot.com/2010/01/parenting-coordinator-concept-lack-of.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.barbrack.com/news/20-rules-of-engagement-for-parent-cooridnators.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.barbrack.com/news/20-rules-of-engagement-for-parent-cooridnators.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lexi</title>
		<link>http://domesticdiversions.com/index.php/parenting-coordination-with-high-conflict-families/comment-page-1/#comment-13741</link>
		<dc:creator>lexi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticdiversions.com/?p=609#comment-13741</guid>
		<description>The logic described above does not add up.  PC get paid handsomely some where $200/hr.  So it is in best interest of PC to keep both party conflicted so that they can keep PC employed.  I have more trust in judicial system then PC.  Also there should be a governance body for PC who ensure PC are operating in ethical boundary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic described above does not add up.  PC get paid handsomely some where $200/hr.  So it is in best interest of PC to keep both party conflicted so that they can keep PC employed.  I have more trust in judicial system then PC.  Also there should be a governance body for PC who ensure PC are operating in ethical boundary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erma  Piasta</title>
		<link>http://domesticdiversions.com/index.php/parenting-coordination-with-high-conflict-families/comment-page-1/#comment-9759</link>
		<dc:creator>Erma  Piasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticdiversions.com/?p=609#comment-9759</guid>
		<description>I find your article very informative. Have you though of net working with other PC&#039;s
 I would be interested in what other PC&#039;s from other states had to say about High Conflit 
families they had to deal with and what sucesses they might have had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find your article very informative. Have you though of net working with other PC&#8217;s<br />
 I would be interested in what other PC&#8217;s from other states had to say about High Conflit<br />
families they had to deal with and what sucesses they might have had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

